True Orthodoxy in Russia

 In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

 Brothers and sisters, the union of ROCOR with MP was signed 5 years ago  and now both in Moscow and in New York they celebrate this anniversary.   It is appropriate for us also to call to remembrance this event, which  they celebrate as joyful, but we regard as a disaster.

 Bishops are given authority in the Church to teach and to rule. However when a bishop teaches, he conveys not his own ideas, but the teaching of  Christ, the Gospel. Otherwise the congregation would not listen to that  bishop and accuse him of heresy.

 Likewise, when bishops direct, they do not impose on the Church their  own will. The Church is directed by the Holy Spirit and not by humans.  Bishops are the instrument, through which the Holy Spirit exercises His  administration, as the Apostles say in the resolution of their council,  as we read in the Acts of the Apostles: “It seemed good to the Holy  Spirit, and to us..” (Acts 15).

 One could say: “They were Apostles, and they were able to directly  recognize what seemed good to the Holy Spirit, but how can our bishops, ordinary people, know this?” – They cannot. That’s why they have to act  with fear and trembling, so as not to establish something against God’s  will, so as not to appear “resisting the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7).

 Bishops should act in the Church not as dictators. When they make a  decree, they should listen to the mystical voice of the Church, if it accepts or rejects this decree. The defender of truth in the Church is the whole of the Church congregation.

The Church is the Body of Christ, the Divine-human organism; it is not  a worldly corporation, whose managers can direct as they like. Such an  attitude with regard to the Church is blasphemous.

When the bishops offered the Church the idea of the Union they hadn’t  yet sinned; their sin was that they pushed their wish through, in spite  of the apparent resistance of the Church.

The process of the unification took several years, during which it  became evident that the Church didn’t accept this idea. Was the Union  right or wrong? – Let us not forget that the final answer for this question does not depend on logical arguments. The final answer belongs only to the Church. The answer was: No.

 Nevertheless, the bishops didn’t change their mind, but instead they  started to force the Union through, using hypocrisy, demagogy and intrigue. The Union was organized by people who imagined that they have  authority over the Church and they can do with it whatever they want.  They imagined that they are the Church. Their sin was that they decided that they can direct the Church as they wish, as if it were a worldly  corporation. It was the sin of unbelief in the Church, the sin of  Sergianism.

 Throughout the several years before the Union it was obvious for any impartial observer, that the final decision had been already made, that it had been made behind the doors by a certain group, – not by the Synod  or the Council of bishops, but by an influential clique. It was obvious that the so called “unification process” was only a farce; the decision  had already been made, anyway.

 The Church was forced into the Union, but the Church is free and cannot  be forced into anything. The proof of this is the fact that everywhere, in all dioceses, in all parishes, there are the faithful who resist the  Union. They call us schismatics, but in fact this division is a healthy  immune reaction of the Church organism to the untruth introduced in the  Church; this division is the evidence that the Church is alive and free. 

The Church didn’t accept the Union. They went their way, but the Church  didn’t follow them. The Church is not where the majority is. In the time of ancient heresies, sometimes only a few remained Orthodox and the  great majority joined the heresy. But after some time Orthodoxy  triumphed. It will be likewise now as well. The untruth of the Union with Sergianism will be exposed for all.

 They demagogically justified the Union by love of Russia and the  Russian people, while in reality the Union with Moscow was treason of  the Russian people, it was a union with its oppressors. Russia is enslaved by ungodly, criminal authorities; the Russian Church is  enslaved by serganists. In such a situation the independent, truthful  voice of the ROCOR was precious for Russia. This voice was heard in Russia even behind the Iron Curtain, and especially after the fall of  communism.

 After the Union ROCOR totally lost its spiritual freedom and as a  result lost all its significance and influence, and became just one of   the dioceses of MP. Thus, who profited by the Union? – Those, whom the  free voice of ROCOR disturbed: Russian civil and church authorities.

 We believe, that one day the Russian Church will become free from Sergianism, and then, not from us, whom they name schismatics, but from  the Church in Russia they will hear condemnation of their treason.

 They say that nothing have changed in the ROCOR after the Union. In   reality only daily routine has stayed mostly the same. Most sadly, as a  result of the Union they themselves changed. The longer one goes on the  wrong way, the more he moves away from the goal. Five years they have
  been moving in the wrong direction, and they have gone quite far away.

 Who would have believed 5 years ago that a bishop of ROCOR would take  part in an ecumenical conference, would recognize Roman-Catholicism as a   sister-church, as was the case recently; a previously deposed bishop,  who has entered into a same-sex union with a male was appointed as a  rector of a parish by the Synod in New York. These and similar facts
 show that their spiritual perception has obscured.

For us the fifth anniversary of the Union is an important milestone. We  will now serve a thanksgiving moleben. We give thanks to the Lord, that  He didn’t abandon His Church, that He gave Vladyka Agafangel wisdom and  strength to lead the Church on the royal path, not deviating to the  right or to the left. Amen.


Discuss this Post in our Forum or Comment Below.

Share/Bookmark
May 29, 2012

Commentary by Fr. Andrei Erastov on the Marking of the Five Year MP-ROCOR Union

 In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.  Brothers and sisters, the union of ROCOR with MP was signed 5 years […]
May 29, 2012

Epistle Of ROCA Synod Of Bishops Regarding The Five Year Marking Of The MP-ROCOR Union

Epistle of the ROCA Synod of Bishops To It’s God-Loving Flock, Dear brothers and sisters!Five years have passed since the time, when an attempt was made […]
May 28, 2012

Open Letter of Holy Ascension Parish ROCOR(A)

An Open Letter from the Parish Council of the Holy Ascension Russian Orthodox Church to the God-loving Flock of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad At the […]
May 28, 2012

ROCOR-A Council of Bishops on Sergianism

EPISTLE BY ROCA SYNOD OF BISHOPS ON SERGIANISM The ROCA Synod of Bishops met in the Theophany Monastery outside of St.  Petersburg May 22-24 and issued […]